In the Integrated Scientific Assessment, maps, charts, and figures are included under a "List of Figures." UNIX and PC-based postscript map files from the List of Figures in this science document were prepared by the Spatial Team and
are provided below.
Pagesize (8.5x11) postscript files of published document
graphics are available to download on either a UNIX or WINDOWS platform.
| Figure 1 | Topography |
| |
|
| Figure 4 | Ecological Reporting Units |
| |
|
| Figure 5 | Hydrologic Hierarchy |
| |
|
| Figure 8 | Major Ownerships Within Assessment Area |
| |
|
| Figure 12 | Changes in Fire Regimes From Historic to Current(Severity Class) |
| |
|
| Figure 13 | Changes in Fire Regimes From Historic to Current(Frequency Class) |
| |
|
| Figure 15 | Predicted Road Density Classes |
| |
|
| Figure 16 | Road Densities by ICBEMP Subsample Watersheds |
| |
|
| Figure 17 | Current Key Salmonid Presence |
| |
|
| Figure 18 | Historic Key Salmonid Presence |
| |
|
| Figure 19 | Number of Key Salmonid Species Within Strongholds |
| |
|
| Figure 20 | Aquatic Strongholds and Areas of Very Low Road Densities |
| |
|
| Figure 22 | Centers of Endemism and Rarity and Centers of Biodiversity (for Plants and Animals) |
| |
|
| Figure 23 | Hotspots for Rarity/Endemism and Biodiversity |
| |
|
| Figure 24 | Counties Experiencing Higher Population Growth
(Metropolitan and Recreation Counties, from Johnson and Beale 1995) |
| |
|
| Figure 25 | Bureau of Economic Analysis Economic Subregions |
| |
|
| Figure 26 | Isolated Timber-Dependent Communities (with Economics Areas) |
| |
|
| Figure 28 | Explanation Mine and Deposit Status |
| |
|
| Figure 29 | Reliance on FS/BLM Timber Harves |
| |
|
| Figure 30 | Reliance on FS/BLM Forage |
| |
|
| Figure 31 | Landscape Themes |
| |
|
| Figure 32 | Current Scenic Integrity (Source: Evaluation of Alternatives) |
| |
|
| Figure 33 | Forest Integrity Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 34 | Range Integrity Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 35 | Forest Hydrologic Integrity Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 36 | Range Hydrologic Integrity Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 37 | Aquatic Integrity Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 38 | Forest Clusters |
| |
|
| Figure 39 | Range Clusters |
| |
|
| Figure 40 | Composite Ecological Integrity Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 42 | Economic Resiliency Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 43 | Socioeconomic Resiliency Ratings |
| |
|
| Figure 45 | Risk of Human Ecological Interaction (BLM/FS Administered Lands) |
| |
|
| Figure 48 | Management Option 3 Proposed Reserves |
| |
|
| Figure 49 | Long-term Trends in Ecological Integrity: Management Option 1 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
|
| Figure 50 | Long-term Trends in Ecological Integrity: Management Option 2 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
|
| Figure 51 | Long-term Trends in Ecological Integrity: Management Option 3 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
|
| Figure 55 | Long-term Trends in Risk of Human Ecological Interaction: Management Option 1 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
|
| Figure 56 | Long-term Trends in Risk of Human Ecological Interaction: Management Option 2 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
|
| Figure 57 | Long-term Trends in Risk of Human Ecological Interaction: Management Option 3 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
|
| Appendix: | Counties |
| |
|
| Appendix: | Subbasins |
| |
|