| Figure 1 | Topography |
| |
| Figure 4 | Ecological Reporting Units |
| |
| Figure 5 | Hydrologic Hierarchy |
| |
| Figure 8 | Major Ownerships Within Assessment Area |
| |
| Figure 12 | Changes in Fire Regimes From Historic to Current(Severity Class) |
| |
| Figure 13 | Changes in Fire Regimes From Historic to Current(Frequency Class) |
| |
| Figure 15 | Predicted Road Density Classes |
| |
| Figure 16 | Road Densities by ICBEMP Subsample Watersheds |
| |
| Figure 17 | Current Key Salmonid Presence |
| |
| Figure 18 | Historic Key Salmonid Presence |
| |
| Figure 19 | Number of Key Salmonid Species Within Strongholds |
| |
| Figure 20 | Aquatic Strongholds and Areas of Very Low Road Densities |
| |
| Figure 22 | Centers of Endemism and Rarity and Centers of Biodiversity (for Plants and Animals) |
| |
| Figure 23 | Hotspots for Rarity/Endemism and Biodiversity |
| |
| Figure 24 | Counties Experiencing Higher Population Growth (Metropolitan and Recreation Counties, from Johnson and Beale 1995) |
| |
| Figure 25 | Bureau of Economic Analysis Economic Subregions |
| |
| Figure 26 | Isolated Timber-Dependent Communities (with Economics Areas) |
| |
| Figure 28 | Explanation Mine and Deposit Status |
| |
| Figure 29 | Reliance on FS/BLM Timber Harves |
| |
| Figure 30 | Reliance on FS/BLM Forage |
| |
| Figure 31 | Landscape Themes |
| |
| Figure 32 | Current Scenic Integrity (Source: Evaluation of Alternatives) |
| |
| Figure 33 | Forest Integrity Ratings |
| |
| Figure 34 | Range Integrity Ratings |
| |
| Figure 35 | Forest Hydrologic Integrity Ratings |
| |
| Figure 36 | Range Hydrologic Integrity Ratings |
| |
| Figure 37 | Aquatic Integrity Ratings |
| |
| Figure 38 | Forest Clusters |
| |
| Figure 39 | Range Clusters |
| |
| Figure 40 | Composite Ecological Integrity Ratings |
| |
| Figure 42 | Economic Resiliency Ratings |
| |
| Figure 43 | Socioeconomic Resiliency Ratings |
| |
| Figure 45 | Risk of Human Ecological Interaction (BLM/FS Administered Lands) |
| |
| Figure 48 | Management Option 3 Proposed Reserves |
| |
| Figure 49 | Long-term Trends in Ecological Integrity: Management Option 1 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
| Figure 50 | Long-term Trends in Ecological Integrity: Management Option 2 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
| Figure 51 | Long-term Trends in Ecological Integrity: Management Option 3 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
| Figure 55 | Long-term Trends in Risk of Human Ecological Interaction: Management Option 1 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
| Figure 56 | Long-term Trends in Risk of Human Ecological Interaction: Management Option 2 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
| Figure 57 | Long-term Trends in Risk of Human Ecological Interaction: Management Option 3 (BLM/FS Administered Lands Only) |
| |
| Appendix: | Counties |
| |
| Appendix: | Subbasins |
| |